Response to comment from Blog posting #1:
Ulrike brought up a good point on
the person administering the test. They may hold the power as they have that power to manipulate
and present it in many different ways. They are strangers which is a huge factor
in accuracy. How can we say this child knows this or this child knows that? The
ones who would know child best is either parent or teacher. Yes it takes a whole lot of time away having
to check off and input data which leaves employees feeling overwhelmed and
exhausted! I like the word Ulrike used, “uniform.” Thatʻs exactly what it feels like the purpose of
it all is.
So in any assessment program being used, who holds the power? Well, the child learns from everything around
him/her and therefore has the power to create their own story, as shared in the
TSGold site. Children have the power to
create their own story, yet is some how manipulated by teachers, who then hold
the power. Now that I think about it, everyone
plays a part in holding the power.
By definition, according to google, school readiness is foundational across early childhood systems and programs. It means children are ready for school, families are ready to support their childrenʻs learning, and schools are ready for children. Furthermore, physical, cognitive, social and emotional development are all essential ingredients of school readiness. According to Hatcher et al.,"The increased academic demands of Kidergarten (Goldstein, 2007) resulted in expectations that preschool children will enter kindergarten having some familiarity with print, letter and sound recognition, and begin writing skills."
School readiness applies to the teacher and child, of course. Teachers get children ready for the next level of education. Readiness shapes our children in what they should know. If they are not up to par, then children are then labeled in having delays. Power plays into readiness as it manipulates and shapes children into these robots, basically, forcing children to know this, this and that. Readiness does not look the same across all cultures as each culture has their own culturally-appropriate curriculum. Of course, children learn according to their environment and their culture, therefore having a diverse idea of what school readiness should be. However, children are tested and labeled, as not being “ready” because society has one measurement statewide where children are compared with and placed as exceeding, meeting or well below their benchmarkers.
As for last week screeners, Brigance and
DIAL, those are tests used for student placement. I kind of got a head of myself lol as I
shared my experience with WSO, which was this weeks blog assignment. So, I will not go on about WSO as I have
already shared my thoughts about that program and will be sharing my thoughts
on TS Gold. These two programs are
assessments that are used in the classroom that teachers use throughout the
school year to guide their curriculum.
These are observations made by the teachers in the classroom, and rated
according to what teacher observes. Teachers have more power here, as the
screeners from last week, those programs hold the power. My experience in using WSO can be meaningful,
but like I said, it is very time consuming.
I have never used TS Gold, but from watching the videos and reading up
on this program, it seems to be more user friendly and focuses more o guiding
your teaching. Meaning, it is more detailed in telling the stories of our
children throughout their learning. What
makes this program so awesome, is that it also gives lessons you can use to
further childrenʻs learning and pin-points exactly what children know and where they need
to grow and strengthen. I love the color
band system that will tell you where child is at and where they should be at
childʻs actual age. It also extends to
sharing this information with families and how to help the childʻs growth at
home as well. Honestly, unless you have
actually used the program, you really canʻt understand
how useful these programs can be in the classroom. You can read up on it and watch videos on it,
but you really canʻt understand the program until you have first-hand experience utilizing
them. I dislike WSO, but hard to say which
I prefer because I havenʻt tried TS Gold. However, I would rather use TS Gold in
replacement of WSO.
Aloha Kemomi,
ReplyDeleteYour comment that children are expected to be robots was interesting - I agree, it seems to suggest that children are expected to all be on the same level at the same exact time, and if they are not, then it is their fault (or the fault of their previous teachers, their families, etc.) rather than the society that didn't take into account the uniqueness of each child and his/her development. How, then, we can re-frame the readiness conversation to be one more based on realistic expectations for young children, and how we can all better support children, schools, families and society help us all get "ready" for those children as they are?
I appreciate you sharing your experiences with WSO. A lot of students who use TS Gold really like it. However, despite its popularity, there's still room for critiques of it. For instance, if you are spending all of your energy and time on making sure you are collecting all the data that needs to be collected, are you engaging in actual authentic assessment? This is something a student of mine from last semester brought up, and I'm hoping to have a conversation with her sharing these ideas. I hope you'll take a listen once I record our conversation - I'll be curious to hear your thoughts! Mahalo!